Showing posts with label rampage jackson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rampage jackson. Show all posts

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Quinton Rampage Jackson beats Matt Hamill


The categorical eventuality of UFC 130 upon May twenty-eight in Las Vegas, Nevada was ostensible to be a classical striker vs. grappler match-up, Quinton Rampage Jackson vs. Matt Hamill.

And whilst both fighters did what they could to levy their diversion upon a other, it was in conclusion Rampage Jackson who was means to keep a quarrel station with a small of a most appropriate takedown invulnerability he’s shown in years.

It helped which Hamill was telegraphing his shots … as good as not environment them up with punches.

He did stay in parsimonious as good as sell with a clumsy Jackson, though paid for it mightily. By a finish of a opening frame, Hamill was cut as good as obviously overmatched.

Wrestling might be a most appropriate bottom for MMA, though it won’t assistance a flicker over if it’s a saved fighting match.

Heading in to a event, a light heavyweight pretension design was pale as good as unclear. Speculation was prevalent which possibly Lyoto Machida or Jackson would be a subsequent male to plea 205-pound kingpin Jon Jones.

Then Dana White put an finish to all that, creation transparent prior to a categorical label went live which if “Rampage” was to better Hamill — as good as come divided full of health — he would be awarded a pretension shot.

Mission achieved … upon both ends.

Hamill was game, eating copiousness of punches as good as knees upon a approach to a judges scorecards. But he mounted subsequent to no offense as good as offering really small in a approach of defense, as well.

The subject right away becomes — will White have a shift of heart as good as confirm to give Machida a pretension shot over Jackson? The disapprove birds which done their voice listened in a loss seconds of this quarrel had to have been listened by Dana White, shrill as good as clear.

Who deserves it more? “Rampage” or “The Dragon?”